SSansFiction
The libraryCollectionsJournalStatsFor authors
Sign inJoin now →
Sansfiction,

A digital library for books. Made by readers, for readers.

v 2.0 · 2026
The library
  • Discover
  • Collections
  • Book tracker
  • Journal
  • Stats
For authors
  • SF Links
  • Analytics
  • How it works
  • FAQ
Elsewhere
  • X / @sansfiction
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact
© 2026 SansFiction · Digital · GlobalA quiet room for your reading life.
Navigation
Library
Bookshelf
Journal
Discover
Collections
Tierlists
Stats
Profile
Author Page
Link Builder
Account
Sign in
S
G
JT
§Author· 1 book

James T. Farrell

An American novelist, most famous for the Studs Lonigan trilogy.

Wikipedia ↗
§All Books
Cover of Studs Lonigan Trilogy: Young Lonigan/The Young Manhood of Studs Lonigan/Judgment Day by James T. Farrell

Studs Lonigan Trilogy: Young Lonigan/The Young Manhood of Studs Lonigan/Judgment Day

James T. Farrell, 1935
1 ratings

§ About James T. Farrell's books

Books on SansFiction
1
Published
1935
Genres
Classics, Fiction, Literary Criticism

The book: Studs Lonigan Trilogy: Young Lonigan/The Young Manhood of Studs Lonigan/Judgment Day (1935)

[William V. Lipton][1] from Ann Arbor, MI says: "This is both a coming-of-age novel and a social history. Set during the 1920s and 1930s, it follows Studs as he grows through his teen years in Chicago. It shows the influences on urban children, the stresses on families and the American society during that time.

Common questions about James T. Farrell

Who is James T. Farrell?
An American novelist, most famous for the Studs Lonigan trilogy.
What is James T. Farrell best known for?
James T. Farrell is best known for Studs Lonigan Trilogy: Young Lonigan/The Young Manhood of Studs Lonigan/Judgment Day, published in 1935 with 1 ratings and a 5.0 average. It is the most-rated of James T. Farrell's books on SansFiction.
What genres does James T. Farrell write?
James T. Farrell's books on SansFiction are tagged Classics, Fiction and Literary Criticism.

Explore: Classics · Fiction · Literary Criticism